<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Rethinking Conspiracy - Conspiracy Theory - tribe.net</title>
    <link>http://conspiracytheory.tribe.net/thread/e11c5eb7-5d7d-41d5-a171-d31891979e7b?format=rss</link>
    <description>Tribe.net. Local Connections</description>
    <item>
      <title>Rethinking Conspiracy</title>
      <link>http://conspiracytheory.tribe.net/thread/e11c5eb7-5d7d-41d5-a171-d31891979e7b#1f502d00-be66-4f6f-bcac-9cae3cbeecc5</link>
      <description>http://www.examiner.com/x-4172-Sacramento-Statehouse-Examiner~y2009m4d18-Rethinking-Conspiracy&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
The article looks at the way terms like “conspiracy theorist” and “conspiracy nut” are not only used incorrectly, but unfairly, as forms of emotional appeals to discredit opponents with whom they disagree for reasons of ideology rather than logic.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:50:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://conspiracytheory.tribe.net/thread/e11c5eb7-5d7d-41d5-a171-d31891979e7b#1f502d00-be66-4f6f-bcac-9cae3cbeecc5</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-19T21:50:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>



