<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Rethinking Conspiracy - Conspiracy Theory - tribe.net</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://conspiracytheory.tribe.net/thread/e11c5eb7-5d7d-41d5-a171-d31891979e7b?format=atom" />
  <subtitle>Tribe.net. Local Connections</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <title>Rethinking Conspiracy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://conspiracytheory.tribe.net/thread/e11c5eb7-5d7d-41d5-a171-d31891979e7b#1f502d00-be66-4f6f-bcac-9cae3cbeecc5" />
    <author>
      <name>Shawn</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://conspiracytheory.tribe.net/thread/e11c5eb7-5d7d-41d5-a171-d31891979e7b#1f502d00-be66-4f6f-bcac-9cae3cbeecc5</id>
    <updated>2009-04-19T21:50:31Z</updated>
    <published>2009-04-19T21:50:31Z</published>
    <summary type="html">http://www.examiner.com/x-4172-Sacramento-Statehouse-Examiner~y2009m4d18-Rethinking-Conspiracy&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
The article looks at the way terms like “conspiracy theorist” and “conspiracy nut” are not only used incorrectly, but unfairly, as forms of emotional appeals to discredit opponents with whom they disagree for reasons of ideology rather than logic.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-04-19T21:50:31Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>



